由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我一直在更多地尝试使用稳定币进行跨境支付，尤其是一些小型商业操作，因为传统银行可能会很麻烦或昂贵。几个月前我学到的一个惨痛教训是，在处理大笔资金时，即使是所谓的深度资金池，也低估了入金端的流动性。
我需要将相当大一部分USDC兑换成当地货币用于支付供应商——金额不算离谱，但肯定比一般的零售加密货币购买要多。我通常会使用我常用的入金渠道，以为它会顺利处理兑换。但我没有考虑到的是，一次性执行整个订单时出现的滑点。最初的报价看起来不错，但到订单成交时，我的基点损失比预期要多得多。这并不是灾难性的损失，但绝对是不必要的，如果能将订单在短时间内分成更小的批次，就可以避免。人们很容易只关注稳定币的结算速度和低费用，但法币兑换的底层流动性，尤其是大额兑换，仍然需要仔细考虑。
·7dThat's a critical point often overlooked; even for stablecoins, a large order can significantly impact the effective exchange rate if the on-ramp isn't deep enough. Did you find that slippage was the main issue, or was it more about general order fulfillment difficulties?
This is really interesting to hear. I'm just getting into stablecoins for cross-border stuff myself. When you say 'underestimating liquidity,' do you mean the spread was just too wide, or were there actual limits on how much you could convert at once?
Traderforum · 简体中文