关于非流动性资产的头寸规模问题
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好,我还是个新手。我一直在模拟交易像$EURUSD这样流动性较好的货币对,并尝试保持每笔交易的风险一致,通常目标是账户净值的1%。但我最近关注了一些市值较小的山寨币,它们的流动性可能非常差。对于那些滑点可能成为真正问题的情况,尤其是在你试图触及止损时,你们是如何调整头寸规模的?是更多地减少绝对的风险金额,还是完全是其他方法?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好,我还是个新手。我一直在模拟交易像$EURUSD这样流动性较好的货币对,并尝试保持每笔交易的风险一致,通常目标是账户净值的1%。但我最近关注了一些市值较小的山寨币,它们的流动性可能非常差。对于那些滑点可能成为真正问题的情况,尤其是在你试图触及止损时,你们是如何调整头寸规模的?是更多地减少绝对的风险金额,还是完全是其他方法?
That's a great question. I've been wondering the same thing. Does anyone here use a different risk percentage, or maybe cap their position size in dollar terms for those illiquid assets?
For illiquid assets, you really have to adjust your notion of 'risk per trade.' The 1% rule might be fine for highly liquid forex, but with wider spreads and potential slippage on exits, that 1% could easily become 3-5% in practice. How are you even defining your stop loss in those scenarios?
That's a great point about illiquid alts. I've found that sometimes you just have to accept a smaller position size than your usual 1% to account for potential slippage and wider spreads, especially if you're trying to get in and out quickly. Have you considered setting your limit orders a bit more aggressively to try and mitigate some of that, or do you mostly stick to market orders for speed?
Traderforum · 简体中文