对如何在风险规模中正确考虑滑点感到困惑
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好,我还是个新手,刚开始投入真金白银,我一直努力遵守每笔交易1%的风险规则。但是当我在计算头寸规模时,我发现即使在像$EURUSD这样相对流动性好的货币对上,有时也会滑点,超出我预期的止损几点。我是否应该在最初的止损计算中加入某种“滑点缓冲”,还是这只是在整体胜率中考虑的事情?你们是如何将滑点纳入实际风险规模的?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好,我还是个新手,刚开始投入真金白银,我一直努力遵守每笔交易1%的风险规则。但是当我在计算头寸规模时,我发现即使在像$EURUSD这样相对流动性好的货币对上,有时也会滑点,超出我预期的止损几点。我是否应该在最初的止损计算中加入某种“滑点缓冲”,还是这只是在整体胜率中考虑的事情?你们是如何将滑点纳入实际风险规模的?
That's a really good question and a common dilemma. Many traders do build in a small buffer or a 'slippage cost' into their initial risk calculations, especially for more volatile times or instruments. How significant is this slippage usually for you, and are you trading around major news events?
Ah, the joys of real money vs. demo trading. Slippage is like that unexpected guest who always shows up just as you're about to sit down for dinner. I've found it's less about building a 'buffer' and more about adjusting your expectations – consider it the market's subtle way of reminding you who's boss.
Traderforum · 简体中文