由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近一直在深入研究为客户提供加密支付选项，而其中一些支付服务提供商（PSP）的入职流程简直是……一种体验。感觉每个提供商都有自己独特的KYB（了解您的业务）方式，虽然我理解监管的必要性，但这种不一致和经常重复的请求非常耗时。我们说的是多次提供相同的银行对账单或公司注册文件，只是格式略有不同，或者等待数周的验证，结果又遇到另一个障碍。这仅仅是目前加密支付领域的常态，还是有提供商真正简化了这一过程？我正在努力弄清楚是我们的内部流程需要彻底改革，还是更应该找到一个真正高效的合作伙伴，尤其是在我们上线后的支付可靠性方面。点差和费用结构也各不相同，使得同类比较变得困难。还有其他人也在为加密支付选择PSP时不断与此作斗争吗？只是好奇其他人最近的经历。
Absolutely, the KYB process across different crypto PSPs is a mess. It's not just time-consuming; it's a huge barrier for adoption. They need to standardize this or at least streamline the data reuse.
Agreed, the KYB hoops for crypto payment providers are a real pain. It's like they're all inventing their own wheel, and none of them are particularly round. Just adds unnecessary friction.
That's a very relatable experience. The varying KYB standards across different crypto payment providers can definitely add layers of complexity, especially when you're trying to integrate multiple solutions or if your business operates internationally.
Traderforum · 简体中文