由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人遇到过，在尝试让一个预计交易量很大的新加密货币商户入驻时，与支付服务提供商（PSPs）之间存在巨大障碍？标准的KYB流程对于加密原生业务来说感觉完全不足，而额外的繁琐程序往往导致数周的延迟。具体问题：为复杂的DAO结构确定最终受益人（UBOs）以及证明财库运营的资金来源，常常让他们的合规团队感到困惑。即使我们谈论的是合法的、链上可验证的交易，传统系统也无法应对。有没有哪个参与者真正做对了这一点，还是说这仍然主要是一个定制解决方案的噩梦？
It's a persistent issue. We've found some success by proactively providing extensive documentation on DAO legal wrappers and treasury management protocols, even before they ask, but it still often requires multiple escalations.
I've definitely seen this, especially with legacy PSPs that aren't crypto-native. It feels like they're trying to fit a square peg in a round hole with their traditional KYB, rather than adapting to the unique structures of web3. Have you had any better luck with PSPs that specialize in digital assets?
Traderforum · 简体中文