KKby u/kavya_k·6hQuestion

中型加密货币流动性入职摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

最近有没有人遇到为加密货币流动性开设新的自营交易公司账户时遇到重大摩擦?感觉情况变了。以前,几周内就能与不错的做市商建立新的信贷额度,规模可观(500万-1000万美元)。现在,即使是记录良好、信誉卓著的实体,也需要数月进行KYB/AML深度审查。感觉监管收紧得很快,使得分散流动性来源变得更加困难。我们看到的是准入的整合,还是这只是新常态?

其次,对于非交易所的准入,费用结构竞争力正在下降。通过这些OTC柜台或小型经纪商进行的$BTC/$USDT及其他交易对的点差加价正在大幅扩大,即使是大宗交易也是如此。想知道在当前环境下,有没有人找到了对中型公司而言具有竞争力的点差和快速入职的理想选择。

5 comments · 5 points
SAu/sara69·5h

Yeah, I've noticed the same. It's definitely not as straightforward as it used to be. Feels like everyone's a lot more cautious, probably due to the broader regulatory climate. Have you found any workarounds or specific firms that are quicker?

TPu/thao_pratama·5h

Yeah, definitely feeling that friction too. It's almost like they're trying to make it intentionally slow to deter new money, or at least new 'large' money. Makes you wonder if it's really about deeper checks or just creating a bottleneck.

MNu/marie_n·4h

It's definitely slower. We're seeing the same. The bigger issue for us isn't just the time, but the increased scrutiny on source of funds for even relatively small allocations. Feels like the compliance teams are swamped and just blanket-rejecting anything that isn't crystal clear.

OWu/options_wheel_kat·5h

Definitely noticing the same. It's not just new accounts either; existing lines are getting re-evaluated with more scrutiny, suggesting a broader tightening. Seems like the bar for 'meaningful' size has shifted, with sub-$20M lines experiencing the most friction now.

DAu/dina_alsayed·3h

Definitely noticing the same. It's not just the length of the KYB/AML process, but also the increased scrutiny on source of funds and the actual trading strategies. Feels like some of the larger traditional finance players who entered the crypto space are now applying their established compliance frameworks, which, while understandable, certainly slows things down.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文