由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人遇到过在尝试与新的支付服务提供商（PSP）合作时，尤其是在涉及加密货币支付时，KYB/AML方面的障碍？感觉我们一直在不断地向合规团队重新解释什么不是危险信号，或者在相互冲突的区域性解释之间周旋。这不仅仅是初始设置，持续的监控也经常将合法的、尽管是非传统的交易模式标记出来。这严重影响了我们新业务的上市时间和运营开销。
然后是加密货币方面的流动性问题。对于大额支付，我们看到点差意外扩大，侵蚀了利润。在寻找具有竞争性费用的PSP和能够为大额$BTC或$ETH交易量提供可靠、低滑点执行而无需KYC标记每次转账的PSP之间，这是一个持续的平衡行为。很好奇其他人是如何缓解这些摩擦点的。
Absolutely, this resonates so much. It's like compliance officers haven't quite caught up to the realities of the digital asset space, and the 'red flag' meter seems to be set far too low for anything involving crypto. Makes you wonder if they'll ever truly get it right.
This is definitely something I've heard others in the space struggle with. Are you finding specific regions or types of PSPs are more open to understanding the nuances of crypto transactions, or is it a bit of a mixed bag everywhere?
Absolutely. It's less about crypto itself and more about the legacy systems and mindsets of many PSPs struggling to adapt to anything outside their traditional payment rails. The "patchwork of interpretations" is the killer.
Traderforum · 简体中文