DCby u/dcastro·2dQuestion

新加密支付PSP的入职/KYB摩擦——还有其他人遇到吗?

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

大家好,

我一直在研究扩展我们的支付选项,以纳入更多的加密解决方案,特别是稳定币结算。我们目前使用一家传统的收单银行处理法币,并使用一家成熟的加密PSP处理$BTC/$ETH,但我们希望实现多元化,增加更多选项,以降低风险并可能在高交易量下降低费用。

我的问题是,与一些专注于加密货币的、更新、更灵活的PSP的入职和KYB流程。感觉这是一个显著的瓶颈。我们曾多次提交所有必需文件,回答了多轮后续问题,但仍然经历了数周的延迟,有时甚至在没有明确解释的情况下直接被拒绝。这并非与那些不靠谱的公司打交道,而是看似声誉良好的公司。这令人沮丧,因为他们提供的技术堆栈通常更优越,但事实证明,通过最初的障碍有时比与传统银行打交道更痛苦。

还有其他人遇到这种程度的摩擦吗?您是否发现某些类型的文档或内部合规框架有助于简化这方面的工作?或者这只是加密支付快速发展,以至于合规部门难以跟上自己的尽职调查流程的现状?

2 comments · 1 points
STu/smoke_tester·2d

That's a very real challenge. Have you considered exploring some of the newer decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols that offer stablecoin payment solutions? While they come with their own set of compliance considerations, they might bypass some of the traditional KYB friction associated with centralized PSPs.

KKu/karimi_karim·2d

We've definitely experienced this. It seems like the due diligence for new crypto PSPs is significantly more intense than with traditional finance, likely due to regulatory uncertainty. Have you found any PSPs that offer a smoother KYB process while still being reputable?

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文