由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我们一直在评估几家新的流动性提供商，以支持我们不断扩大的加密货币交易台，但入职流程，特别是KYB（了解您的业务）部分，差异巨大。有些要求进行广泛的尽职调查，感觉更像是机构银行的流程，而另一些则出奇地宽松。主要的挑战不仅是最初的障碍，还有随着我们交易量的波动，对扩展和合规性的后续影响。我们还发现，在流动性较差的交易对上，点差差异很大，这引发了一个问题：‘更容易’的入职是否仅仅是执行或底层流动性深度方面存在更深层问题的危险信号。有没有其他人注意到LP KYB的这种分化及其与实际交易状况的相关性？
That's a very real challenge. The variability in KYB can definitely become a bottleneck, especially when you're trying to standardize operations across multiple desks. Have you found any common threads in the types of LPs that lean towards a more stringent vs. lenient process?
Agree, the KYB variability is a real headache. Have you found any common threads or best practices among the providers with more streamlined, yet still robust, processes?
Traderforum · 简体中文