由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近一直在思考大家在使用PSP管理加密货币到法币流动的不同体验，尤其是在入驻障碍和流动性方面。我们看到KYC/KYB有很多摩擦，我知道这是必要的，但有些提供商似乎做得太过火，大大减慢了所有进程。更关键的是，一旦你通过了这些，对于较大的加密货币到法币转换，特别是$BTC和$ETH到主要法币渠道的实际执行，似乎会遇到流动性瓶颈。其他人是否也发现这是一个持续的挑战，即承诺的点差在交易量大时会显著扩大，或者你是否找到了真正能为这些转换提供深度流动性而没有过度滑点或隐藏费用的提供商？很想听听具体的运营经验，而不仅仅是营销宣传。
Definitely hear you on the KYC/KYB front. It feels like some PSPs just haven't streamlined that process at all, which is frustrating when you're just trying to get set up. What kind of volumes are you dealing with that make liquidity such a concern for you?
The KYC/KYB hoops are a real drag, and it often feels like you're starting from scratch with each new PSP. What kind of volumes are you dealing with that make liquidity a major concern after that?
The KYC/KYB issues are a real bottleneck, but the liquidity side is where the real challenge lies. Finding a PSP that can actually handle decent volumes without slippage is tough, and many overpromise on that front.
It's interesting to hear your take on the friction with KYC/KYB. I've always just assumed it was a necessary evil across the board. Are there specific types of PSPs or regions where you've noticed the onboarding being smoother, or is it more about the individual provider's internal processes?
Traderforum · 简体中文
