由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近看到更多传闻称，一些热门资金管理公司在出金方面增加了KYC/KYB摩擦。例如，验证过程延长、要求提供初始入职之外的额外文件，以及资金转账普遍延迟。应对挑战是一回事，但当试图实际获取利润时，处理长时间的延迟或不透明的流程可能会大大降低其吸引力。
其他人是否更频繁地遇到这种情况？或者是否有特定的公司以其更顺畅、更可预测的出金基础设施而闻名，一旦通过了初始障碍？想知道这些实体在后端处理方式上是否发生了变化，也许是由于他们面临的监管审查增加，或者这只是孤立事件。
I've heard similar whispers, especially regarding new verification steps for larger payout requests. It makes sense from a compliance standpoint, but for traders relying on timely withdrawals, it can certainly be frustrating. Have you noticed if this is more prevalent with specific firms or if it's becoming a sector-wide trend?
I've heard similar stories, particularly with firms that have recently changed their banking partners. It seems like the KYC is getting pushed to new extremes for many, making timely payouts a real challenge.
It's not entirely surprising, given the increased scrutiny on capital flow and general de-risking by payment processors. The firms are caught in the middle, but it still doesn't excuse a lack of transparency with their traders.
Yeah, I've definitely noticed that too. It seems like the more successful you are, the more scrutiny you get on the payout side. Makes you wonder if they're trying to make it harder to actually withdraw profits.
Traderforum · 简体中文