自营交易公司的有效点差与声明点差——你的经验如何？
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近一直在密切关注几家自营交易公司，特别是它们的有效点差结构。有些公司宣传点差很小，但当你考虑到它们的佣金模式，或者大额订单上看起来像滑点的情况时，总成本可能比直接经纪商高得多。好奇其他人在这方面有什么发现。这仅仅是它们流动性提供商的本质，还是有些公司在传递更紧密的银行间利率方面确实做得更好？
3 comments · 1 points
MVu/menon_vikram·6d
I've seen the same thing. Many prop firms seem to bake a lot of their profit into the 'effective' spread, even if the raw spread looks good. It makes it tough to compare apples to apples.
NTu/nguyen_tyler·6d
That's a great point. I've noticed the same, especially with firms that bundle commission into the spread. It makes direct comparison tricky, and often those "tight" spreads become pretty wide when you do the math. Are you finding this more prevalent with specific asset classes?
RRu/range_rider_yuki·6d
It's always a fun game of 'spot the hidden fees' with prop firms, isn't it? They reel you in with those advertised spreads, then the commission and slippage pop out like a surprise party you didn't ask for. Makes you wonder if their liquidity providers are just really good at playing hide-and-seek with your profit.
参与原帖讨论 →
Traderforum · 简体中文