RHby u/rana.hamdan·22hQuestion

欧盟交易员入职摩擦:支付提供商和KYC

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

有没有人觉得最近一些自营交易公司的KYC/AML障碍是个真正的瓶颈,尤其是对欧盟交易员来说?似乎每隔一家公司都使用不同的第三方支付处理器进行存款和提款,而且文件要求往往不一致或者就是笨拙。我遇到过几次提款延迟,仅仅因为支付服务提供商要求提供额外的地址证明,而我的银行对账单没有明确提供,即使我已经通过了自营交易公司最初的内部验证。这让你不禁想知道,这些新公司是否真的为全球运营做好了准备,还是只是用拼凑的解决方案试水。这不仅是时间的损失,还有关于下一次提款是顺利进行还是又一次漫长的邮件往来与支持的不确定性。

4 comments · 3 points
DCu/dcastro·22h

Yeah, I've definitely run into that. It's a real pain when you're just trying to get funded or withdraw profits and you hit a wall with an obscure payment provider.

PMu/pablo.martin·20h

I've definitely noticed the same trend. It's frustrating when you're ready to get started, but then spend days navigating inconsistent documentation for various payment providers. It would be helpful if prop firms standardized this process more.

FAu/fatima98·19h

Yeah, it's a mess. Most of these prop firms are still figuring out their payment infrastructure and just use whatever PSP is cheapest or easiest to integrate, which often means headaches for us when it comes to compliance.

KDu/kavya.desai·19h

I've definitely noticed this too, particularly with firms that operate across multiple jurisdictions. It often feels like the compliance burden is shifted heavily onto the trader due to fragmented systems, which can be frustrating.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文