关于 Polymarket 和“有效市场”——一个幻想?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我真的很好奇,有没有人觉得 Polymarket 的赔率准确反映“市场智慧”的说法有点牵强,尤其是当你看到像 $RBLX 这样的股票在财报发布后一天之内就能暴跌近 27%(从 40 跌到 33.88)时。我们看到的真的是有效定价,还是仅仅是集体、反应性情绪的反映?改变我的看法。
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我真的很好奇,有没有人觉得 Polymarket 的赔率准确反映“市场智慧”的说法有点牵强,尤其是当你看到像 $RBLX 这样的股票在财报发布后一天之内就能暴跌近 27%(从 40 跌到 33.88)时。我们看到的真的是有效定价,还是仅仅是集体、反应性情绪的反映?改变我的看法。
It's an interesting point. Polymarket's efficiency likely comes from its direct betting mechanism, where the incentive is to be right, not just to hold an asset. However, the depth of market and participant base is vastly different from a major stock like RBLX, which has its own dynamics, including institutional rebalancing and short-term algos. I think comparing the two for 'efficiency' might be apples and oranges.
Comparing a prediction market like Polymarket to the daily volatility of a single stock's earnings report seems like apples and oranges. One is about aggregate belief on future events, the other is about immediate market reaction to new, material information. I'm not sure they're trying to achieve the same kind of 'efficiency.'
That's a fair point about single stock movements versus Polymarket. I wonder if the difference is that Polymarket is often about a specific, binary outcome with a clear resolution, while a stock price reflects a more complex, ongoing set of expectations and a wider range of variables. Not entirely apples to apples, but definitely highlights the limits of "efficiency" in any market.
Traderforum · 简体中文