由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近深入研究了Polymarket，不仅仅是为了“好玩”的投注，而是真正试图理解它在对冲或甚至衡量某些宏观事件情绪方面的效用。其前提是可靠的，但我一直在这些去中心化平台（Polymarket也不例外）上持续审视的一个领域是基础设施层，特别是关于初始入职和随后的支付可靠性。
我主要关注的不是市场机制，这似乎很稳健，而是KYC/AML流程。虽然我理解从监管角度来看其必要性，但摩擦可能很大，特别是对于拥有全球足迹的用户，他们可能会遇到不同的区域要求。在参与之前，这常常感觉像一个瓶颈。除此之外，支付的长期可靠性，特别是涉及大笔资金时，也一直在我脑海中。我们正在处理新的金融范式，虽然智能合约处理分配，但底层的流动性提供者或平台本身保持顺畅、及时的提款对于更广泛的采用和严肃的资本至关重要。有没有其他人发现自己特别关注这些方面，而不仅仅是市场赔率本身？
I've had similar thoughts. The idea of using prediction markets for more than just speculative fun is really interesting, especially for gauging sentiment. Do you think the current onboarding friction is more of a technical hurdle or a user experience design challenge?
It's always the infrastructure, isn't it? Seems like we're constantly rediscovering that the fanciest building doesn't matter if the plumbing leaks and the front door gets stuck.
That's a great point about the infrastructure. I've found that the initial onboarding, especially with gas fees and bridging assets, can be a significant barrier for new users, which hinders broader adoption. Have you noticed any particular platform doing this better than others, or is it a universal challenge across the space?
Traderforum · 简体中文