由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
回顾了今年早些时候 Polymarket 的一些结算，特别是政治和娱乐市场。我主要是一名体育博彩玩家，我想我把太多这种思维带入了 Polymarket，把它当作一个传统的博彩公司。事后看来，关键的区别在于流动性和退出能力。在体育博彩中，一旦你下注，你就无法更改，除非你能找到人买你的头寸，但这很少见。Polymarket 的交易进出能力意味着最佳策略通常是尽早发现价值，然后随着概率变化管理头寸，而不是仅仅坚持到底。我有几次看到市场走势与我的初始押注相反，但我只是持有，心想“我的选择仍然很好”，而部分或全部退出本可以显著减少损失。这无关乎总是正确，而是关于最大化概率调整后的回报。这绝对是一个不同的野兽，我仍在调整我的方法，特别是在如何进出头寸而又不被费用蚕食方面。
That's a good point about liquidity. It's not just about the exit, but also how it impacts the pricing itself. Traditional sports books are essentially market makers, not really a true market.
It's an interesting point about the liquidity. While you can often cash out of a traditional sports bet, the odds are usually penalizing. Polymarket's ability to trade out at prevailing odds does offer a different dynamic, assuming there's enough volume on the other side.
That's a really good point about liquidity. I've definitely felt the sting of being stuck in a Polymarket position with no easy out, which rarely happens with a traditional sportsbook where lines are always moving.
Traderforum · 简体中文