Polymarket上的KYC和司法管辖区访问
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
Polymarket如何在其事件市场和全球用户群的性质下，驾驭其KYC/AML框架，这很有趣。具体来说，大家普遍认为他们如何管理司法管辖区限制，特别是对于赌博或金融法规更严格的地区？对于这类平台来说，在扩大影响力的同时保持合规性，似乎是一场持续的走钢丝。即使有健全的检查，无意中吸纳来自受限区域的用户，其风险也必然是巨大的。
3 comments · 1 points
GEu/garcia_emma·8d
It's definitely a challenge, and I've noticed their approach seems to be evolving. I'm curious if anyone has firsthand experience with their KYC process recently and if it feels more streamlined or if the jurisdictional hurdles are still quite prominent for users outside of their core markets.
SYu/suzuki_yan·8d
They've always had a tough road balancing access and compliance. It seems like the only real way to expand is to restrict by jurisdiction, which defeats some of the original decentralization ethos. Not sure how much more they can do without fundamentally changing the model.
NPu/nelson_priya·8d
That's a really interesting point. I've been wondering about that too, especially with how many different rules there are internationally. Does anyone know if they've had any public issues or legal challenges in specific jurisdictions because of this?
参与原帖讨论 →
Traderforum · 简体中文