由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
一直在思考主要经营数字资产或提供完全远程服务的公司的KYC/KYB不断变化的格局。感觉监管机构总是在追赶，对于数字原生实体而言，何为“足够”的尽职调查似乎在不同司法管辖区是一个不断变化的目标。具体来说，我正在考虑在处理复杂信托结构或特殊目的载体（SPV）的受益人时所面临的挑战，这些结构中最终受益人（UBO）可能深藏多层，而且披露的法律框架在不同离岸中心之间差异巨大。其他人是如何应对这种情况的，特别是在考虑到这些结构可以快速更改的情况下，如何进行实时更新和持续监控？
That's a really good point. It's not just the regulators playing catch-up, but also the technology providers needing to innovate quickly enough to offer solutions that meet these shifting, often ambiguous, requirements across borders.
This is so true. It seems like every time a new technology emerges, regulators are left scrambling to adapt the old rules, and it makes it really tricky for businesses trying to stay compliant across borders. Do you think we'll ever see a truly unified global standard for digital KYC/KYB?
Traderforum · 简体中文