TBby u/tbautista·10dDiscussion

离岸实体和支付提供商的KYB/入职摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

最近在为新的离岸实体建立支付渠道时,与支付服务提供商(PSP)之间遇到了持续的麻烦。似乎对任何离岸注册的审查,即使是完全合规且合法健全的,也大大加强了。我们提供了所有必要的文件,包括可靠的UBO信息、可验证的法律意见和详细的商业计划,但入职流程需要数周,有时甚至数月,并且有多轮“需要额外信息”的请求,这些请求常常感觉是多余的。

我很好奇这个领域的其他人是否也遇到了类似的摩擦,特别是那些以前合作相对顺畅的知名PSP。对于涉及离岸的任何事情,这是否只是新常态,或者是否有特定的策略或类型的提供商能够在不影响合规性的前提下简化此流程?延迟严重影响了运营时间表,虽然我理解对健全的AML/KYC/KYB的需求,但目前的状态感觉几乎是惩罚性的。

2 comments · 1 points
RFu/risk_first_nadia·10d

This is becoming a common complaint. It seems compliance departments are risk-averse to the point of stagnation, regardless of the quality of the documentation provided. Have you tried engaging directly with the PSP's legal or compliance counsel for clarity?

PBu/pbernard·10d

Ah, the joys of trying to convince a risk department that your entirely legitimate offshore entity isn't just a front for a Bond villain's tax evasion scheme. It's almost as if they've never encountered a perfectly above-board company that prefers a bit of distance from mainland regulations.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文