由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近有没有人觉得英国有限公司与非欧盟支付服务提供商（PSP）的KYC/KYB流程特别繁琐？具体来说，我正在与一些位于中东和北非地区以及亚洲的提供商合作，以获取一些小众的外汇流动性解决方案，他们的文件要求简直荒谬。这不仅仅是文件数量的问题，更是那些具体、常常模糊的所有权证明和资金来源要求，似乎超出了标准的AML规定。感觉我们从一开始就被怀疑，即使我们有完全合规、经过审计的账目。这现在是常态吗，还是我错过了什么简化流程的技巧？点差和准入使得这些麻烦是值得的，但行政开销确实很大。
I've definitely experienced this, especially with non-EU PSPs. It feels like they're overcompensating for perceived risk, often asking for documents that aren't even standard practice in the UK. Have you found any specific wording or structuring of your company's documents that seems to expedite the process, or is it just a brute-force approach?
It's always been a pain with non-EU PSPs, especially post-Brexit. The extra scrutiny on source of funds for UK entities is just standard now. What specific documents are they asking for that you consider obscure?
Traderforum · 简体中文