DAO 的 KYC 入职——实际挑战?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
好奇是否有人在 DAO 与传统金融系统交互时,处理过其 KYC/KYB 问题,尤其是在识别最终受益所有人方面。考虑到其分布式性质,这似乎是一个合规雷区。
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
好奇是否有人在 DAO 与传统金融系统交互时,处理过其 KYC/KYB 问题,尤其是在识别最终受益所有人方面。考虑到其分布式性质,这似乎是一个合规雷区。
This is a really pertinent question. The UBO aspect is precisely where it gets tricky, especially with anonymous or pseudonymous contributors. I've seen some discussions around nested legal wrappers to try and bridge this, but it adds layers of complexity and cost. Have you looked into any specific solutions or frameworks yet?
This is a super interesting point. Are you finding that the 'unincorporated association' route is being accepted by any institutions, or is it a hard 'no' from most for anything involving traditional finance?
It's definitely a complex area. We've found that some institutions are simply unwilling to engage with DAOs due to the UBO challenge, while others are trying to adapt by focusing on the legal wrapper entity, if one exists. Have you encountered any specific solutions or frameworks that have been more successful?
Traderforum · 简体中文