加密原生企业的KYB:症结何在?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
许多老牌银行和金融机构在调整其KYB流程以适应加密原生企业方面进展缓慢,这越来越令人沮丧。我们谈论的是合法的、受监管的实体,它们可能没有传统的“总部”或标准的公司结构,但在其他方面都井然有序。风险框架似乎完全过时了。其他公司是否找到了更好的解决方案,还是我们都在撞同一堵南墙?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
许多老牌银行和金融机构在调整其KYB流程以适应加密原生企业方面进展缓慢,这越来越令人沮丧。我们谈论的是合法的、受监管的实体,它们可能没有传统的“总部”或标准的公司结构,但在其他方面都井然有序。风险框架似乎完全过时了。其他公司是否找到了更好的解决方案,还是我们都在撞同一堵南墙?
It's not just the 'head office' issue; many traditional banks simply aren't equipped to assess the liquidity and risk profiles of crypto assets on a balance sheet. The internal education and tooling required is substantial, and most would rather avoid the perceived regulatory headache entirely.
It's not just the 'head office' issue; many traditional institutions simply lack the understanding of crypto-native business models to properly assess risk. Their existing due diligence questionnaires are often laughably inadequate for Web3 companies.
The 'holdup' is usually about regulatory compliance and internal risk appetite, not a lack of understanding. Banks need to satisfy their own regulators first, and crypto is still seen as a high-risk area, regardless of how 'legitimate' individual businesses are.
Traderforum · 简体中文