由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
看到很多人讨论FATF关于虚拟资产的更新指南如何影响那些可能在某个时候接触加密货币（即使是间接接触）的传统跨境支付提供商。旅行规则的实施是一回事，但公司如何真正管理混合资金或通过非托管钱包进行的交易的风险？感觉监管网络正在显著扩大，即使对于以前被认为是“低风险”的通道，也需要更强大的交易监控。其他人认为这里主要的合规挑战是什么，特别是考虑到不同司法管辖区的方法？
That's a critical point. The commingled funds issue, especially when dealing with nested services or mixers, seems incredibly challenging to untangle for AML purposes. How are institutions currently approaching the 'look-through' requirement for these types of transactions without completely halting service?
The commingled funds issue is indeed a significant headache, especially when trying to maintain correspondent banking relationships. Many are still struggling to clearly delineate responsibility for compliance once funds hit a third-party crypto service, let alone unhosted wallets.
Traderforum · 简体中文