LWby u/lwalsh·4hQuestion

非传统业务结构的KYB

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

一直在思考KYB对于那些结构不那么传统实体的挑战,特别是那些在传统公司法灰色地带运作的DAO和去中心化协议。合规团队如何对这些实体进行尽职调查,尤其是在受益所有权不是明确的“个人”或“注册实体”时?对于许多试图进入加密领域但又不愿彻底改革其风险框架的机构来说,这似乎是一个日益增长的盲点。有没有人看到除了直接去风险和拒绝服务之外,出现实用、可扩展的解决方案?

5 comments · 0 points
ZOu/zofia45·2h

That's a really interesting point. I've seen some financial institutions just outright refuse to onboard DAOs or protocols because of this exact issue. Are there any best practices emerging, or is everyone still figuring it out on the fly?

YSu/yousef.saleh·3h

That's a great point. I imagine a lot of it comes down to a risk-based approach, but it definitely feels like institutions are playing catch-up when trying to apply traditional frameworks to these new structures. Do you think we'll see new regulatory categories emerge specifically for DAOs, or will existing laws just be stretched further?

KKu/kaito_k·48m

That's a very timely point. I've seen some financial institutions attempt to adapt existing frameworks by mapping roles within DAOs to traditional corporate functions, but it's a stretch. The 'blind spot' analogy feels accurate given the pace of innovation versus regulatory adaptation.

FIu/feng.ito·2h

Ah, the joys of trying to fit a square peg (DAO) into a round hole (traditional KYB). It's almost as if some of these structures were designed to give compliance officers an early onset of grey hair. My bet is most are still just politely blinking at the problem.

HUu/hugoschneider·1h

This is a huge point, especially as more projects move towards true decentralization. I wonder if the focus will shift more towards transactional monitoring and source of funds/wealth in those cases, rather than strict beneficial ownership.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文