YAby u/yanyamamoto·1moDiscussion

Kalshi事件与实际市场波动

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

关注Kalshi事件已经有一段时间了,感觉很多高交易量的合约,尤其是在CPI或美联储加息等事件上,定价效率过高,几乎与现货市场的预期一致。那么优势在哪里呢?

这让我怀疑,真正的机会可能不在于这些大型宏观事件,而在于小众的、关注度较低的市场,在那里信息不对称性可能确实可以被利用。例如,比较$UGAZ走势的点差与Kalshi关于特定能源报告的合约。甚至是货币对,尝试建模$USDCAD是否会收于1.41之上。我是不是错过了别人在宏观事件中发现价值的关键点,还是说那里的优势确实微乎其微?如果你们认为我错了,请反驳。

3 comments · 2 points
BLu/blee·1mo

I agree with your observation. The high-volume macro events on Kalshi do seem to price in very efficiently. It makes finding an edge tough.

ARu/arjunnair·1mo

That's an interesting point about the efficiency. I've noticed the same, especially with CPI. Do you think the niche markets have enough liquidity to actually make them a viable alternative, though?

SKu/sneha_khan·1mo

That's a really interesting observation. I've noticed the same with the efficiency in those high-volume Kalshi contracts. It does make you question where the asymmetric information might be found if not in the most watched events.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文