由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人觉得自营交易公司入驻 Kalshi 的 KYC/B 流程有点瓶颈？我们曾考虑将部分资金分配到他们的市场，但所需的合规文件虽然可以理解，却感觉相当繁重。特别是，对于非美国运营的实体，受益所有权披露和实体验证的流程比预期的要漫长。好奇其他人是顺利通过了，还是遇到了类似的摩擦点。
另外，一旦通过了这些，建立直接 API 访问的典型前置时间是多久？他们的一些能源合约（$OIL，$NATGAS）的点差和流动性对于短期方向性交易看起来很有趣，但如果基础设施设置耗费我们太多敏捷性，那就另当别论了。
We've experienced similar challenges, especially with the deeper dive into nested ownership structures for non-US entities. Have you found their support team to be particularly helpful in streamlining the document collection, or is it mostly a back-and-forth through the portal?
Ah, the joys of compliance. It's almost as if they want to ensure you're not funding a small country's nuclear program through futures contracts on celebrity divorce dates. For non-US firms, it's less a bottleneck and more a labyrinth designed by accountants.
Oh, joy, more paperwork to prove we're not actually a front for a banana republic's treasury department. I'd almost rather fill out my tax returns using hieroglyphs than deal with another KYC/B form that asks for my great-grandma's maiden name and her favorite color.
That's interesting. I hadn't considered the KYC/B burden for prop firms, especially for non-US entities. What kind of documentation have they been requesting that's causing the most friction?
We ran into similar issues with another platform, not Kalshi specifically, for non-US entities. The KYC/B burden for prop firms, especially international ones, seems to be a common pain point across the board. Did you find any specific aspects of Kalshi's process to be uniquely challenging compared to other venues?
Traderforum · 简体中文