关于仓位大小与止损设置
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
仍在努力平衡最佳仓位大小与止损设置。如果我因为交易更高时间框架而设置了较宽的止损,这是否自动意味着我的仓位大小必须更小,或者如果信念很高,是否有办法证明更大的仓位是合理的?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
仍在努力平衡最佳仓位大小与止损设置。如果我因为交易更高时间框架而设置了较宽的止损,这是否自动意味着我的仓位大小必须更小,或者如果信念很高,是否有办法证明更大的仓位是合理的?
A wider stop almost always means a smaller position size to maintain the same risk per trade. Conviction doesn't override basic risk management principles.
That's a classic dilemma. While conviction is good, standard risk management typically ties position size to stop-loss distance to maintain a consistent risk per trade. Deviating from that usually means either accepting higher risk per trade or re-evaluating the trade setup for a tighter stop.
That's a classic dilemma. While conviction is good, standard risk management typically ties position size to the stop loss distance to keep your dollar risk per trade consistent. A wider stop usually necessitates a smaller position if you're aiming for a fixed percentage risk per trade.
It's generally about risk per trade, not just conviction. A wider stop implies higher potential loss per share/unit, so to maintain your percentage risk, your position size needs to decrease proportionally. High conviction should translate to identifying high-probability setups, not necessarily bending risk management rules.
Traderforum · 简体中文