由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
大家好，刚加入。我一直在努力理解正确的头寸规模，特别是对于流动性较差的资产。我理解R倍数和每笔交易承担固定百分比资本风险的原则，但当你面对像微盘股这样点差巨大，甚至是一些新型代币化资产时，你如何实际管理这些？有时，纸面上1%的止损根本无法成交，反而会穿仓更多。你是大幅减小头寸规模，还是有其他方法来思考当流动性是主要因素时的“有效”风险？感觉标准公式在这种情况下不太适用。
·4dThis is a really good question, and something I've been wondering about myself. It seems like the standard advice just doesn't quite fit when you can't even get out of a position at your theoretical stop loss. How do you even account for that slippage or lack of depth in your initial risk calculation?
That's a classic problem. For illiquid assets, the bid-ask spread itself can make a traditional stop-loss almost impossible to execute without significant slippage. Many resort to mental stops or a much wider percentage.
That's a great question, and it highlights a common challenge. For illiquid assets, the bid-ask spread itself can make a traditional percentage-based stop loss very difficult, sometimes even impossible to execute without significant slippage. Have you considered adjusting your risk calculation to account for the spread's impact on your effective entry and exit points, rather than just the last traded price?
This is a great question. For illiquid assets, the practical execution of a fixed percentage risk per trade gets really tricky. You often have to adjust your R-multiple calculations to account for slippage or use much wider mental stops, effectively reducing your position size compared to what a technical 1% stop might suggest.
Traderforum · 简体中文