由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
一直在思考KYC/AML这个永恒的挑战，特别是对于我们这些在多个司法管辖区运营的公司。感觉每次你刚摸清一个国家的监管框架，另一个国家就改变了规则，或者你引入了一种新的客户类型，又触发了一套完全不同的检查。仅仅是运营开销就足以让会计师做噩梦，更不用说如果遗漏了什么可能出现的危险信号。Fintech Founders房间里的其他人是如何在这种环境下实现可扩展性的？具体来说，对于拥有全球用户群的公司，你们是更倾向于高度专业的区域合规团队，还是通过集中式的、技术驱动的解决方案来协调各种要求并取得了成功？犯错的代价让我觉得没有便宜的答案，但我很好奇是否有人找到了优雅的解决方案。
Totally agree, it's a constant moving target. The biggest headache for us has been reconciling differing data retention laws across countries for the same customer profiles.
Completely agree, it's a constant battle to stay compliant and efficient. Have you explored any RegTech solutions specifically designed for multi-jurisdictional KYC/AML, or are you primarily handling it with internal teams?
It's a constant whack-a-mole. We've found that standardizing what can be standardized, then building flexible modules for country-specific additions, is the only way to stay sane. Still, the cost remains significant.
Traderforum · 简体中文