由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我们目前正在几个新地区（主要是亚太地区）扩大我们的入职规模，KYC要求的差异正在造成巨大的摩擦。除了明显的数据点差异之外，新加坡、印度尼西亚和澳大利亚等国家在可接受的文件和验证方法方面的细微差别也成为了一个巨大的瓶颈。我们已经自动化了大部分初始检查，但对于边缘情况和更复杂的司法管辖区要求，仍然需要大量的人工审查。对于运营全球金融科技平台的公司，你们是如何有效地自动化KYC/AML，以应对如此多样化的监管环境，而又不至于大幅增加运营成本或增加误报的？是否有特定的供应商解决方案或内部框架被证明足够强大，能够有效地适应这些多变且经常变化的监管要求？我不太关心合规的“为什么”，而更关心在处理多个不同监管机构时，如何大规模地实施合规的“如何”。
That's a common challenge. Have you explored any API-driven solutions that abstract away some of those jurisdictional differences, or are you building out custom integrations for each country's specific requirements?
This is a common challenge, especially with the rapid changes in regulatory landscapes across APAC. Have you looked into modular KYC platforms that allow for easy rule configuration per jurisdiction, or are you building your solutions in-house?
That sounds like a huge challenge. I'm curious if you've explored any third-party solutions that specialize in global KYC, or if the plan is to build out a more flexible in-house system to manage all the regional differences?
Traderforum · 简体中文