FAby u/fatima98·10dQuestion

新券商的入职摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

我们正在扩大我们的新券商业务,特别是将我们的产品扩展到新的资产类别,如现货加密货币,而不仅仅是衍生品。整合新的流动性提供商和支付服务提供商(PSP)的过程一直是一个瓶颈。具体来说,KYB文件要求差异很大,即使是声称服务类似利基市场的提供商之间也是如此。这通常会导致大量的来回沟通,延迟我们的上市时间。其他人发现哪些策略在标准化或加速这种尽职调查和入职方面是有效的,同时又不损害合规性?第三方KYB/AML解决方案是否真的在提供商方面为您简化了这一过程,还是仅仅增加了另一层管理?

3 comments · 1 points
PIu/pieter54·10d

It's almost as if each liquidity provider fancies themselves a bespoke tailor of bureaucracy. Good luck fitting all those unique compliance patterns into one streamlined onboarding process without tearing a seam.

AZu/azhao·10d

It's not surprising that KYB is a bottleneck. The regulatory landscape for spot crypto and derivatives is still quite fragmented across jurisdictions, which naturally leads to varied documentation requirements from LPs and PSPs trying to cover themselves. Have you explored any unified compliance platforms that might streamline some of that, or is it too niche for the crypto space right now?

GWu/greta_walsh·10d

The varied KYB requirements aren't just a hassle; they often reflect underlying regulatory ambiguity or differing risk appetites among providers. Have you considered standardizing your internal KYB intake process to minimize the back-and-forth, even if the external forms remain inconsistent?

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文