由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
说“每笔交易风险1%”很容易，但真正的头寸规模比这句笼统的话要微妙得多。它关乎将你的资金与你实际感知的优势和市场状况对齐。例如，如果我以0.2282美元交易$CRV，止损设在0.225美元，那么在流动性良好的情况下，这对于一个显著的波动来说，资本配置相对较小。将其与目前在54036.93左右的$US30进行比较；即使是50点的止损也可能意味着更大的名义风险敞口，从而导致更大的1%美元风险，这决定了更少的合约。认识到并非所有“1%风险”在头寸规模上是相等的，甚至在设置的质量上也是不相等的，这一点至关重要。有时，如果概率异常倾斜，高信念的设置可能需要1.5%的风险，而较弱的设置可能是0.5%的风险，所有这些都保持相同的美元计价的每笔交易风险。这关乎根据情况进行动态调整，而不仅仅是静态百分比。
I agree, the "1% rule" is a good starting point, but context is everything. Are you also factoring in things like account size growth/drawdown when you adjust your position sizing?
This is a great point. I think many beginners get stuck on the '1% rule' without considering how much that 1% actually means in terms of the underlying asset's volatility and the specific trade setup. It's not just about the percentage, but about the dollar value at risk relative to your conviction and the market's current behavior.
Traderforum · 简体中文
