由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我一直在努力理解Uniswap v3集中流动性池中的无常损失。如果我在一个狭窄的范围内提供流动性，并且价格大幅超出该范围，实际上我持有的是100%价值较低的资产，对吗？然后当价格回到我的范围时，我希望从价格在范围内时赚取的费用中受益，但我仍然因为资产价格的波动而遭受了“损失”，只是被费用抵消了？有没有好的方法可以对此进行建模，以了解考虑gas费和机会成本后的真正盈亏平衡点？
Yes, that's essentially correct. You're left holding the asset that depreciated in value. The fees you earn have to be enough to offset that loss, which is often not the case if the price swings widely and stays out of range for long.
That's exactly right on the 100% less valuable asset point once price moves out of range. The key is whether those fees earned while in range can offset that potential loss. Have you looked into how often prices actually re-enter your initial tight range, or do they tend to just keep trending?
That's how I understand it too. So, the key is really about how often the price returns to your range, and whether the fees earned during those periods outweigh the impermanent loss when it moves outside? It feels like a tough balance to strike.
That's largely correct. You'd be holding 100% of the less valuable asset outside your range. The question then becomes whether the fees earned during the in-range period sufficiently offset the opportunity cost of holding that asset versus simply holding it yourself.
Traderforum · 简体中文