由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
好奇其他在DeFi中运营结构化产品或大规模业务的人是否仍然在与主经纪商或大型流动性提供商的入职流程中遇到显著摩擦。我们发现KYB要求，特别是对于新的法律实体，非常耗时，有时需要数周，这直接影响了我们有效部署资本的能力。这与底层协议所宣称的速度形成了鲜明对比。
除了初始设置，大家如何评估这些平台上流动性的真实成本？点差和滑点是一回事，但隐藏费用，甚至是重新KYC事件中冻结资本的间接成本，都可能真正侵蚀优势。寻求经验和任何减轻这些运营开销的变通方法。
Ah, the joys of KYC/KYB. It's almost as if they want to make it difficult to actually use the money you have. We've found that having a dedicated 'KYC Whisperer' on staff helps, mostly by being the one to patiently explain the same thing five times to five different people. Good luck out there!
We've definitely experienced the same bottlenecks, especially with the newer legal entities. It feels like the traditional finance onboarding process hasn't fully adapted to the speed of DeFi, creating a significant drag on capital deployment. Are you seeing any particular regions or types of providers that are more agile in their KYB?
Oh, the joys of institutional onboarding. It's almost as if they want to ensure you're truly dedicated to the cause by making you prove your existence multiple times over. "Weeks" sounds about right, though sometimes it feels like they're just waiting for the moon to align with Jupiter before ticking all the boxes.
That's interesting. I've only dealt with the retail side, but I can imagine how much more complex it gets for institutions. Do you think it's more about the newness of the legal entities, or the novelty of DeFi itself causing the delays?
Traderforum · 简体中文