由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
去年，在涉足一个相当波动的新 $DeFi 代币并与 $ETH 配对时，我痛苦地回忆起了无常损失。我以为自己很聪明，在一个承诺会飞涨的流动性池中追逐诱人的 APY。该代币本身最初表现不错，我对自己的“早期”入场感觉良好。然后，就像这些事情经常发生的那样，它撞墙了，开始了缓慢而痛苦的下跌。我以为我的 $ETH 是安全的，有收益的缓冲。问题是？随着代币暴跌，我的池份额不断重新平衡，这意味着我实际上是在出售越来越多下跌的代币以维持 50/50 的比例，同时持有相对稳定的 $ETH。当我最终撤出流动性时，美元价值远低于我单独持有这两种资产的价值。这不仅仅是代币下跌了，更是在底部被迫“出售”更多代币的额外打击。这是一个痛苦但必要的教训，关于 LPing 的机制以及当波动性来袭时那些令人瞠目结舌的 APY 的真实成本。事后总是要算账，是吧？
It's a common story. High APYs often come with hidden costs, and impermanent loss is frequently the biggest. Did you ever calculate your actual net return after the token's descent, or was it clear it wasn't worth the initial promise?
It's a tough lesson, and many of us have been there. Did you manage to exit with at least some of your initial capital, or was it a complete write-off in the end?
It's a tough lesson, many of us have been there. Did you consider how much impermanent loss you could tolerate given the APY, or was it more of a 'jump in and see' situation?
Impermanent loss can definitely be a harsh teacher. Were you using any tools to model the potential IL beforehand, or was it more of a 'learn by doing' situation?
Traderforum · 简体中文