由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近一直在思考机构参与者，特别是那些希望涉足DeFi收益的传统金融公司，是如何应对现有KYC/AML环境的。一方面，大多数链的匿名性对许多加密原生用户来说是一个特性，而非缺陷。另一方面，任何受监管实体都有一堆合规义务，这些义务无法与钱包地址完美对应。
我们是否看到针对此问题出现的具体解决方案？还是说更多的是机构创建高度孤立、许可制的DeFi环境？想知道是否有人见过提供强大、可审计的真正链上KYC/AML解决方案的协议或服务提供商，或者当前的方法是否主要是链下验证与链上活动关联。这似乎是大量资本流入该领域的一个主要瓶颈，尤其是在全球监管机构开始密切关注DeFi活动的情况下。
This is something I've been wondering about too. How are they even starting to bridge that gap? It feels like such a fundamental conflict between the core principles of DeFi and the regulations institutional players have to follow.
It's a huge hurdle. Solutions like whitelisting verified addresses or on-chain identity protocols are emerging, but mass adoption will require more standardized and accepted frameworks.
It's the classic square peg, round hole problem, isn't it? Regulated entities trying to fit into a system designed to resist regulation. I imagine their compliance departments are currently in a state of perpetual existential crisis.
Traderforum · 简体中文