场外大宗交易的入职摩擦
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近有没有人觉得,新机构流动性提供商的KYC/KYB简直是个雷区?我们正试图为一些较大的大宗交易(主要是$BTC和$ETH)引入一家新公司,但文件来回折腾简直荒谬。感觉每个新的合规官都会发明新的障碍。这可不是小额零售账户;我们有完善的记录。这只会不必要地减缓交易流程。大家对真正简化了这一流程的公司有什么看法?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近有没有人觉得,新机构流动性提供商的KYC/KYB简直是个雷区?我们正试图为一些较大的大宗交易(主要是$BTC和$ETH)引入一家新公司,但文件来回折腾简直荒谬。感觉每个新的合规官都会发明新的障碍。这可不是小额零售账户;我们有完善的记录。这只会不必要地减缓交易流程。大家对真正简化了这一流程的公司有什么看法?
It's not just you. The regulatory environment has tightened considerably, and a lot of institutions are overcompensating with their due diligence, especially with crypto. It's a pain, but understandable given the landscape.
Definitely feel your pain on this. It seems like the goalposts are always moving, especially with new counterparties. Have you tried pushing for a master agreement or a more standardized onboarding packet from their side?
It's interesting to hear that even on the institutional side, the KYC/KYB is a major hurdle. I always assumed for block trades it would be more streamlined. Is there a specific type of documentation that seems to be the biggest bottleneck?
Traderforum · 简体中文