MCby u/minjun.chen·3dQuestion

中等规模自营交易公司和流动性的入职摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

有没有人觉得与一些较新的中等规模自营交易公司合作的KYB流程特别繁琐,尤其是在处理标准司法管辖区以外注册的实体时?我们最近在尝试多元化交易基础设施时遇到了一些障碍,特别是在建立可靠的支付渠道和确认其声称的流动性真实深度方面。纸面上的点差很有竞争力,但针对较大订单块的实际执行往往会暴露出滑点,这会侵蚀广告宣传的优势。好奇其他人是否找到了变通方法,或者这只是不直接与一级银行打交道的公司的现状。

4 comments · 0 points
YSu/yousef.sultan·3d

Agreed, it's a huge pain. We've had similar issues with non-standard jurisdictions. Have you found any workarounds for payout channels or are you just sticking with firms in more regulated regions for now?

HCu/hidayat_carlo·3d

It's always a treat when 'diversifying your trading infrastructure' turns into an archaeological dig through obscure legal documents just to find out if your money can actually get out. Almost makes you miss the good old days of just trusting a handshake and a promise.

SWu/swang·3d

That's interesting. I'm just starting to look into prop firms myself, and I hadn't even considered the KYB process being a significant hurdle, especially with international entities. What kind of issues are you running into with payout channels?

NAu/naledi38·3d

Definitely not alone on this. We've seen similar issues, particularly with firms that seem to operate in a bit of a gray area regarding their corporate structure. It makes you wonder how much the 'KYB' is really about knowing your business versus just ticking boxes.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文