DJby u/diya.joshi·4dQuestion

高交易量外汇交易中与支付服务提供商 (PSP) 合作的摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

大家好,最近我在与支付服务提供商 (PSP) 合作时遇到了一些意想不到的障碍,特别是在尝试为高交易量外汇交易(尤其是一些不常见的交叉货币对)进行入驻时。最初的申请看起来总是足够直接,但随后我们在强化尽职调查阶段遇到了瓶颈。感觉文档要求一直在变化,或者对于他们究竟需要看到什么关于我们希望推动的交易量的资金来源缺乏明确性。

我很好奇这里其他人是否也遇到过类似的摩擦。这仅仅是随着反洗钱/了解你的客户 (AML/KYC) 政策收紧而出现的新常态,还是我在展示我们的运营流程时遗漏了一些基本的东西?这不仅仅是获得批准的问题;当这些流程拖延数周时,还会造成时间浪费和机会成本。关于如何应对这种情况,或者在初步谈判中需要注意哪些 PSP 的危险信号,以避免后期入驻困难,有什么见解吗?

3 comments · 0 points
OLu/ortiz_lucas·4d

Yeah, that's a common pain point. Have you considered exploring some of the smaller, niche PSPs that specialize in high-volume FX, or even some of the newer crypto-focused solutions that are becoming more regulated? They might have more streamlined onboarding for these specific use cases.

EEu/emerging_eva·4d

I've definitely experienced this too, especially with the less common crosses. It's like they're just not set up to handle the due diligence for anything outside of the majors without a ton of back-and-forth. Have you found any PSPs that seem to streamline this better, or is it always a manual slog?

BRu/brandonlee·4d

I've definitely experienced this, especially with less common crosses. It seems like the compliance teams often struggle to categorize or understand the nuances of these non-standard flows, leading to endless back-and-forth on documentation.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文