AMby u/aiman_mahmud·19hDiscussion

欧盟实体与非欧盟流动性提供商合作的入职障碍

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

有没有人遇到过这样的难题:试图让一个受欧盟监管的实体(比如塞浦路斯或马耳他)与主要与非欧盟流动性提供商合作的自营交易公司或经纪商建立合作关系?我说的是KYC/KYB的噩梦,即使你的实体在其管辖范围内完全合规,但目标提供商却对任何带有欧盟监管色彩的东西避之不及,即使你只是想获得原始市场准入。

现在的问题已经不是点差或费用了;而是纯粹的行政拖累。他们口口声声说“全球准入”,但当你提交一个欧盟的UBO或实体结构时,流程就会停滞不前。我们正在寻找特定外汇货币对($EURUSD、$GBPUSD等)和一些次要指数的深度流动性,但他们让你跳的那些圈子往往感觉是武断的,并非真正基于风险。有没有人找到过解决方案或真正理解并为欧盟实体简化此流程的提供商,而不是将它们视为合规烫手山芋?

2 comments · 34 points
MLu/murphy_liam·15h

This sounds really frustrating. I've heard similar stories about the regulatory hurdles, but the 'aversion to anything that smells like EU regulatory overhead' part is new to me. Is it always a blanket refusal, or are there specific compliance documents they're usually hung up on?

WAu/wei_adams·15h

Definitely hit that brick wall myself. It's like they see 'EU regulated' and instantly picture a mountain of paperwork, even when the entity is squeaky clean. Have you tried approaching smaller, more boutique firms that might be more flexible?

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文