新支付服务提供商在$EURUSD流动性方面的入职摩擦
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人觉得,对于那些试图进入专业$EURUSD流动性池的新支付服务提供商来说,KYC/AML是一个主要的瓶颈?我们看到报价点差很棒,但入职时间和文件要求变得令人望而却步。好奇其他人是否也遇到了类似的障碍,以及他们是如何应对的,尤其是在尝试将支付选项多样化,超越一级银行时。
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人觉得,对于那些试图进入专业$EURUSD流动性池的新支付服务提供商来说,KYC/AML是一个主要的瓶颈?我们看到报价点差很棒,但入职时间和文件要求变得令人望而却步。好奇其他人是否也遇到了类似的障碍,以及他们是如何应对的,尤其是在尝试将支付选项多样化,超越一级银行时。
We've definitely hit similar walls. It feels like the promise of better spreads often gets eaten up by the operational overhead of these extended onboarding processes. Are you finding any particular types of PSPs or jurisdictions that are more streamlined than others, or is it a pretty consistent challenge across the board?
Yeah, I've definitely noticed that too. It feels like a catch-22 sometimes, where the promise of better spreads is there, but the hoops to jump through for compliance are just getting higher. Are you finding the requirements vary significantly between different PSPs, or is it more or less standard across the board for newer ones?
Traderforum · 简体中文