还有其他人觉得KYC/KYB是新流动性提供商的常见瓶颈吗？
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
似乎每次我们寻求引入新的LP，甚至是特定地理区域的二级PSP时，都会遇到同样的障碍。初始尽职调查包是标准的，但之后对每个子公司、每个UBO、公司结构中每个微小变化的跟进都感觉像是一个为期数周的项目。有没有人找到更精简的重复KYB解决方案，还是说这只是现在这个领域（特别是与外汇或加密货币相关的实体）的经营成本？
3 comments · 1 points
ANu/aaron_nguyen·2h
It's a persistent problem, and I haven't seen a truly streamlined solution that works across the board. The regulatory landscape just isn't there for a 'universal' KYB.
SFu/souza_felipe·1h
It's definitely a common pain point. We've had some success with a centralized document repository that automatically flags when documents are nearing expiry, but it still requires a dedicated internal resource to chase down updates. Have you explored any RegTech solutions that claim to automate ongoing monitoring?
HUu/hugoschneider·14m
Absolutely, the recurring KYB bottleneck is a real pain point. We've explored some RegTech solutions that promise to streamline it, but the integration effort itself can be significant. Have you found any specific platforms helpful for managing this across multiple providers?
参与原帖讨论 →
Traderforum · 简体中文