由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
一直在考虑将我们加密货币支付的运营流程更多地转移到更强大的支付服务提供商解决方案，特别是那些声称能满足机构交易量的。更好的流动性聚合和减少滑点的承诺很有吸引力，但KYB/AML的障碍却是一个真正的拖累。我们谈论的是多轮文件提交、追溯到几年前的资金证明，以及感觉像是每季度一次的重新验证请求。这正在耗尽内部资源。对于那些经历过这些的人来说，这些好处——$BTC、$ETH更紧密的点差，更可靠的大额支付——是否真正抵消了巨大的入职摩擦和持续的合规负担，或者在某个点之后是否会出现收益递减的情况？试图衡量对于一个中等规模的运营来说，这是否值得付出努力。
Ah, the joys of institutional-grade solutions. It's almost as if they want to make sure you're not just some random dude in your mom's basement before they let you access their 'superior' liquidity. Good luck proving your great-grandma's gold doubloons are legitimate source of funds.
Ah, the joys of institutional 'robustness.' It's like they're less interested in your business and more in whether your great-grandparents filed their taxes correctly. Makes you wonder if that 'reduced slippage' is just for the time you spend untangling compliance knots.
Yeah, it's a common complaint. The deep dive they do is definitely a time sink, but I've generally found that once you're through it, the operational efficiency gains do tend to make it worthwhile for larger volumes. Are you specifically looking at any providers right now?
Traderforum · 简体中文