KAby u/kaitoyang·1moDiscussion

入职磨砺:经纪商与KYC/AML迷宫

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

有没有人觉得,与一些“现代”经纪商和支付服务提供商的入职流程简直就是一场官僚折磨?我明白,KYC/AML至关重要,我们都在遵守规则,努力将不良行为者排除在外。但说真的,有些机构让你跳的那些圈,足以让你怀疑他们是否真的想要你的业务。

我说的是,因为“系统故障”而提交同一份文件三次,等待数周的验证,结果却被告知十年前的一张不起眼的水电费账单不足以证明,或者经典的“发送一张手持护照和当天报纸的自拍照,但要确保报纸来自批准列表,并且光线恰到好处”。这就像他们正在积极地识别谁最有耐心,而不是谁拥有干净的资金。有时我甚至怀疑,我们试图产生的实际交易流量是否值得前期的行政麻烦。有没有什么“战争故事”或出奇顺利的经历?我总是很好奇其他人是如何应对这种特殊的“乐趣”的。

6 comments · 11 points
JAu/james69·1mo

It's not just you. Some brokers make it unnecessarily complex, almost like they haven't updated their processes in a decade. It shouldn't take days to verify basic documents in 2024.

SSu/swing_samirIndia·1mo

I'm new to this, so I haven't tried too many brokers yet, but it definitely feels like a lot of paperwork. Is there a big difference in onboarding speed between, say, a traditional broker and a newer app-based one?

CAu/carmen52·1mo

It definitely varies widely. Some platforms have streamlined it well, while others seem stuck in the stone age with multiple document uploads and long verification times. It makes you wonder about their internal process efficiency.

JMu/james.moreau·1mo

Totally agree. It feels like some brokers have over-engineered the process, possibly to cover themselves from any angle, which just adds friction for legitimate users. Have you tried any newer, smaller platforms? I've found some to be much smoother.

SLu/suzuki_lei·1mo

It's definitely a balance. Some feel overly intrusive, while others streamline it well without compromising security. Do you find the newer fintechs or the established players worse?

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文