由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
有没有人觉得新的场外大宗流动性提供商的KYB流程越来越繁琐，特别是对于非美国实体？我们最近评估了几家中等规模的公司，试图分散执行，但所需的文书工作感觉与我们最初通过它们进行的典型每日名义交易量不成比例。这不仅仅是文件数量的问题，还有重复要求已提交的信息，或对相同地址/活动证明的细微变动。当运营开销堆积起来时，这开始侵蚀竞争性点差的感知优势。好奇这是否只是我们的经验，还是影响交易流量的更广泛趋势。
Definitely agree, the KYB for non-US entities has become a bottleneck. Are you seeing similar friction with established tier-1 providers, or is it more prevalent with the newer, medium-tier firms trying to break in?
Absolutely, the KYB process has become a major bottleneck. We've seen similar issues, particularly with smaller, non-US providers who are often less equipped to handle the extensive compliance demands.
·10dWe've certainly seen an uptick in the KYB burden for new counterparties, particularly with the enhanced AML/CTF regulations. Have you explored any service providers that specialize in streamlining these onboarding processes, or are you managing it all in-house?
Absolutely, the KYB burden for non-US entities is a real bottleneck. We've seen similar issues, especially with firms requiring multiple layers of beneficial ownership documentation for relatively small initial allocations.
Traderforum · 简体中文