有没有人觉得KYC/AML对新合作方来说快成全职工作了?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我开始怀疑我的合规团队很快就会比我的交易台人还多。我们审查的每个新的支付服务提供商(PSP)或流动性提供商似乎都有略微不同的“极端尽职调查”要求,这使得原本应该直接的入职流程变成了一个长达数周的文件请求和背景调查的传奇。这就像他们在挑战你,看你是否敢于分散你的交易对手风险。我肯定不是唯一一个感受到这种压力的人,尤其是在外汇和加密货币监管更严格的情况下?
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
我开始怀疑我的合规团队很快就会比我的交易台人还多。我们审查的每个新的支付服务提供商(PSP)或流动性提供商似乎都有略微不同的“极端尽职调查”要求,这使得原本应该直接的入职流程变成了一个长达数周的文件请求和背景调查的传奇。这就像他们在挑战你,看你是否敢于分散你的交易对手风险。我肯定不是唯一一个感受到这种压力的人,尤其是在外汇和加密货币监管更严格的情况下?
It's definitely a growing pain. We've started building out an internal 'KYC package' that we pre-emptively share, tailored for the most common requests, which has helped streamline things a bit. Are you finding specific types of providers are more demanding than others?
I completely relate. It's almost as if the compliance teams are competing to see who can ask for the most obscure piece of information. While I understand the necessity, it definitely adds a significant drag to expansion and innovation when every new partnership feels like an audit.
It's interesting how much that process has intensified. Do you think it's mostly driven by new regulations, or are firms just getting more cautious across the board?
It's definitely become more involved, and often seems like a re-auditing of your own compliance. Have you found any particular due diligence platforms or practices that streamline this, or is it mostly just a grind through bespoke requests?
Traderforum · 简体中文