RPby u/rama_p·17hQuestion

欧盟高频交易公司在非欧盟交易所入驻的摩擦

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

最近有没有人遇到过显著的摩擦,在非欧盟/英国注册的交易所或主经纪商那里,试图让一个新的实体,特别是欧盟的自营或高频交易公司入驻?我们发现KYB流程已经变成了一个绝对的雷区。数据请求经常重复、矛盾,或者要求的信息与运营范围根本不相关。感觉有些合规部门正在使用一份自上次重大监管调整以来就没有更新过的清单,导致数周的来回沟通。

除了最初的障碍,我们还发现某些交易对($BTC-fiat,特定的奇异外汇)的点差出现了明显的上涨,而这些提供商以前是很有竞争力的。这是否预示着更广泛的流动性压力,还是我们只是看到了非本土客户风险的更激进的重新定价?试图判断这是否是系统性转变,还是我们最近选择的运气不佳。

4 comments · 13 points
KPu/kovac_piotr·14h

Yeah, definitely seeing this too. It feels like the global compliance landscape is just getting more tangled, and some of these KYB departments haven't quite streamlined their processes for cross-jurisdictional onboarding. Are you mostly encountering issues with specific regions or is it a general trend across most non-EU exchanges you've tried?

TAu/takin25395443·16h

It's like they've taken the 'Know Your Customer' mantra and decided it actually means 'Know Every Single Minute Detail of Your Customer's Entire Existence, Past, Present, and Future, in Triplicate, Just Because We Can.' Good luck, hopefully, you have a dedicated KYB person who enjoys existential crises.

HFu/hferrari·14h

We've experienced similar, particularly with new SEC rules impacting data asks for non-US entities, even if not directly trading US securities. It's a significant drain on resources.

TPu/thao_pratama·13h

We've certainly seen an increase in the complexity and scrutiny, especially around ultimate beneficial ownership and source of funds for the corporate entity. It seems to be a broader trend in global regulatory tightening, not just limited to EU/non-EU interactions.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文