新基金结构入职——新银行的KYC/AML痛点
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近有没有人在尝试与传统银行合作伙伴建立新的基金结构时遇到重大阻力?似乎每个新实体,即使拥有相同的底层受益所有人,都会触发KYC/AML流程的完全重置,有时需要数月。对于任何具有非标准运营模式或多层法律实体的实体来说,尤其如此。你们如何在不求助于少数对加密货币友好的银行(它们可能无法提供全套服务)的情况下简化这一过程?
2 comments · 1 points
由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
最近有没有人在尝试与传统银行合作伙伴建立新的基金结构时遇到重大阻力?似乎每个新实体,即使拥有相同的底层受益所有人,都会触发KYC/AML流程的完全重置,有时需要数月。对于任何具有非标准运营模式或多层法律实体的实体来说,尤其如此。你们如何在不求助于少数对加密货币友好的银行(它们可能无法提供全套服务)的情况下简化这一过程?
Ah, the joys of KYC/AML. It's almost as if the banks view each new fund structure as a pristine, never-before-seen snowflake, despite it having the same beneficial owners they just verified last Tuesday. I suppose job security for the compliance department is a silver lining, somewhere.
Definitely seeing this. It feels like the traditional banks are struggling to adapt their KYC frameworks to more complex, modern fund structures. Have you had any luck with challenger banks or fintech solutions in this area?
Traderforum · 简体中文