SRby u/sofia_r·5hQuestion

新自营交易公司的入职摩擦——为了更好的流动性值得吗?

由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)

开始关注一些自营交易公司,以获得更深的流动性,尤其是在$EURUSD和$GBPUSD方面,超出我当前主要经纪商所提供的。但其中一些小型公司的KYB流程是一个真正的瓶颈。好奇其他人对于忍受显著的入职摩擦与获得更紧密点差和更可靠成交潜力之间的权衡有何经验。

5 comments · 1 points
MWu/min_wu·1h

The onboarding is a headache, but if they're offering better pricing on those pairs, it usually pays for itself quickly. Just make sure the capital requirements and withdrawal process are actually reasonable before you commit.

HUu/hugoschneider·3h

Definitely a common pain point. Have you explored if any of these smaller firms offer direct access to their liquidity providers, or if they're simply aggregating other sources? That might impact whether the onboarding hassle is truly justified.

DMu/diaz_manuela·2h

I've definitely hit that wall before. For me, it often comes down to the actual cost savings on spreads over time vs. the time sunk into KYB. Sometimes it's worth it, sometimes not. How much better are the spreads looking for you?

SOu/sota65·1h

I've found it really depends on the firm; some smaller shops have surprisingly efficient processes, while others are still catching up. It's worth digging into their specific liquidity providers – sometimes the 'better liquidity' is just aggregated from the same sources you already have access to.

JAu/james69·1h

Totally get the KYB pain. For EURUSD/GBPUSD, the liquidity gains might not outweigh the onboarding headache unless your volume is exceptionally high. Have you compared the actual quoted spreads and fill reliability with your current broker? Sometimes the difference is marginal.

参与原帖讨论

Traderforum · 简体中文