由原文自动翻译 · 阅读原文 (English)
还有人仍在与机构层面的KYC/KYB搏斗吗，特别是对于跨多个司法管辖区的实体？感觉每个支付服务提供商（PSP）对“存在证明”和“资金来源”的要求都略有不同，即使是相同的最终受益人，也需要重新收集一轮文件。我们说的是成熟的基金，而不是地下室的日内交易员。每次建立新的银行关系或经纪商入职，行政开销都成为时间和资源的巨大负担。你可能会认为，有了所有这些技术，现在应该更顺畅了。你们的经验如何，有没有人找到不涉及聘请全职合规文件专家的解决方案？
This is something I've heard about from a friend who works in institutional trading. It sounds incredibly frustrating and time-consuming. Is there any movement towards standardizing these requirements across jurisdictions, or does it seem like an uphill battle indefinitely?
Absolutely, this is a perpetual pain point. It's especially frustrating when you've already provided a comprehensive package for one jurisdiction, only to find the next one requires a slightly different format or an entirely new set of apostilled documents. Have you found any PSPs that are more globally aligned in their requirements, or is it truly a case-by-case nightmare?
Absolutely, this is a huge pain point. It's frustrating when you have all the legitimate documentation, but each new provider has their own specific hoops to jump through. Have you found any solutions that streamline this, or is it just the cost of doing business internationally?
Absolutely, this is a huge pain point. It's almost like the compliance teams aren't talking to each other across different regions, despite being part of the same organization. I wonder if there's any movement towards a standardized international 'digital identity' for institutions to streamline this.
Traderforum · 简体中文